How the intelligence profile is measured
Measured, not guessed.
Four timed tasks on your phone. Compared with AINIQ users, error margin shown. Figures refresh every night.
Do the intelligence profileWhat is measured
Pattern reasoning
Gf · inductive reasoning3 × 3 matrix, missing cell, 8 options
Series
Gf · serial reasoningNext member of a series, 5 options
Figure rotation
Gv · visualisationThe same object turned, 4 options
Digits backward
Gwm · working memoryA digit sequence backwards, length 2–8
How the tasks are made
- Pattern reasoning: Carpenter rules (constant, progression, distribution, combination, subtraction). Seven distractors, each breaking one rule.
- Series: arithmetic step, alternation, period and letter–number interleaving.
- Figure rotation: objects of 7–10 cubes. Wrong options are mirror images or other objects; a mirror image is never correct.
- Digits: random digits without repeats or long runs.
- Every generator checks that exactly one option is correct. Tasks are drawn by difficulty level, the same task is never shown twice, and the correct answer never leaves the server.
Comparison group and figures
The comparison group is AINIQ users, not the population. Bands from 100 users, percentiles from 500. Error margin 90 %.
Pattern reasoning
Gf · inductive reasoning3 × 3 matrix, missing cell, 8 options
- Comparison group
- Loading…
- Reliability (KR-20)
- Loading…
- Retest correlation
- Loading…
- Device difference (d)
- Loading…
- Task bank
- Loading…
Series
Gf · serial reasoningNext member of a series, 5 options
- Comparison group
- Loading…
- Reliability (KR-20)
- Loading…
- Retest correlation
- Loading…
- Device difference (d)
- Loading…
- Task bank
- Loading…
Figure rotation
Gv · visualisationThe same object turned, 4 options
- Comparison group
- Loading…
- Reliability (KR-20)
- Loading…
- Retest correlation
- Loading…
- Device difference (d)
- Loading…
- Task bank
- Loading…
Digits backward
Gwm · working memoryA digit sequence backwards, length 2–8
- Comparison group
- Loading…
- Reliability (KR-20)
- Loading…
- Retest correlation
- Loading…
- Device difference (d)
- Loading…
- Task bank
- Loading…
Correlations between modules
| What is measured | Series | Figure rotation | Digits backward |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pattern reasoning | Loading… | Loading… | Loading… |
| Series | Loading… | Loading… | |
| Figure rotation | Loading… |
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Monitoring limits
Live figures are compared with these limits. Publication did not wait for them; the figures accumulate from use.
| Criterion | Limit |
|---|---|
| Internal consistency per module | ≥ 0.80 (pattern reasoning ≥ 0.85) |
| Overall reliability | ≥ 0.90 |
| Correlations between modules | 0.30–0.60, all positive |
| Device difference (phone vs desktop) | |d| ≤ 0.20 |
| Retest correlation | overall ≥ 0.80, modules ≥ 0.65 |
| Task quality | point-biserial ≥ 0.15; hit rate 10–95 % |
Limitations
- A percentile places you among AINIQ users, not in the population.
- Below 100 runs a module’s error margin rests on a literature assumption (reliability 0.75).
- The first hundred or so users per module also see unpruned tasks.
- The result is not a diagnosis or an assessment of fitness for work or study, and it never appears in team views.
What we say and what we do not
| We say | We do not say |
|---|---|
| Measured, not guessed. | A single IQ number |
| Error margin shown. | “Accurate” |
| Method published, figures update. | “Scientifically proven” without own data |
| Compared with AINIQ users (n shown). | Compared with the population |
| Your Twin adapts its explanations to your profile. | “You improve your intelligence or memory” |
| For self-knowledge. | Diagnosis, hiring, aptitude |
